Screens Publishes Redlining GenAI Accuracy
As the movement to bring more transparency and understanding to legal genAI accuracy grows, US-based Screens has published another in-depth performance study, this time on …
As the movement to bring more transparency and understanding to legal genAI accuracy grows, US-based Screens has published another in-depth performance study, this time on …
Here we go again. An academic blasts a legal AI tool for not working as expected and the legal tech company moves to defend itself. …
Harvey has publicly launched BigLaw Bench, their own methodology for evaluating the accuracy of genAI tools when used on legal tasks, measuring ‘what % of …
Last week, the first meeting of the genAI Benchmarks Initiative took place at the London office of CMS. Its goal: to scope out a path …
Wolters Kluwer in Australia has a novel solution to genAI hallucinations and errors: don’t entirely trust it on its own. Instead, the company is providing …
Legal genAI company Paxton AI has announced it has achieved ‘93.82% average accuracy on tasks in the Stanford Legal Hallucination Benchmark’. The company has also …
By Tycho Orton. In the wake of Stanford University’s recent paper on AI-driven legal research tools, debate has erupted over the accuracy of these systems. …
In a move aimed at bringing more transparency to the sector, legal tech company Screens, which is the sister business of contract-focused TermScout, has decided …
Generative AI is without doubt the most powerful technology to be applied to the legal sector since the arrival of digital tools, yet it has …
Thomson Reuters has contradicted the findings of a recent Stanford HAI study into its genAI research capability within Westlaw Precision, and stated ‘our thorough internal …
Copyright © 2025 | MH Magazine WordPress Theme by MH Themes